ellestra: (Default)
The thing with the "Future" is that it's creeping so slowly upon us that we don't even notice a science fiction becomes everyday life. Maybe it's because we were taught to expect flying cars and jumpsuits. But I thing cyborgs are good enough.

Claudia Mitchell lost her left arm in a motorcycle accident and she was fitted with new robotic arm from the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. This new arm is "myoelectric," which means it picks up electrical signals coming straight from her brain. Her nerves were surgically rerouted to the chest and the arm electrodes pick them up and send them to the prosthesis computer, which figures out which motion Mitchell is thinking about. The rerouting causes some weird sensations but she gets a pretty functional arm:


Cyborgs are among us.
ellestra: (charlie jade)
I support the idea of Technological Singularity. Maybe not it’s quasi religious, messianic side but the one that promises new worlds and possibilities. And new abilities. I want a Direct Neural Interface. If I was given a chance I would upload myself on computer.

I never understood why so often in books and movies AIs want to be human. It’s a strange obsession. Being biological might be an interesting experience but it’s also annoying and very limiting. I loved Ender books but Card lost me when it turned out that the best thing that ever happened to Jane was human avatar.

Cavil - goals, methods and hypocrisy (spoilers for BSG 4x14) )

Edit: An interview with Battlestar Galactica writers Jane Espenson and Ryan Mottesheard which touches the same subjects.
ellestra: (Default)
I love the idea of Singularity (it works well at scaring Jehovah Witnesses away).
I hope to see at least some of it to come true (other will be there with flying cars - forever future).
I want sentient AIs (finally some intelligent life on Earth).

I think it's a great idea. It should be made more widely known.

This however doesn't mean one is allowed to present such ridiculously, made up thesis as a scientific theory.

I agree on every world of criticism of the Ray Kurzweil's The Singularity Is Near book and especially the diagram he presents there. Collecting random facts and putting them together in a way that fits your views is not science. It’s Intelligent Design. And this diagram has exactly the same flaws. So please don’t use evolution as a crutch for your fail.

Because what’s pissing me off most is the misuse and misunderstanding of evolution in this (especially today, on the eve of Darwin Day). This diagram makes it look like there was a goal, some plan of progress for world. This is the fallacy so many people fall into – “humans are pinnacle of evolution so it all happen just so we could’ve happened”.

It’s not like that. There is no “better” in evolution, no goal, no pinnacle, no end. For evolution loosing most of your organs and becoming a tapeworm is as good as getting a big brain as long as you survive. It’s only progress in the way that’s there is no going back – every time you have to make the same discoveries with new elements because old were lost along the way – like fish and dolphins. Can’t go back but can make similar design from new elements in your disposal. Evolution is a process that favors the best adapted to an environment they live in. It means that when the environment changes you can stop being well adapted and go from being best to worst (or at leas worse). Those who come next are not better. Claiming mammals are better then insects because of brains and steady body temperature is a subjective matter – after all there is so much more of them and they probably survive us.

Humans are neither the end of evolution nor its goal. If we destroy our planet the evolution will still go on for what is left – be it cockroaches or bacteria. And none that happened in these billions of years has been inevitable. Just because there came reptiles or primates didn’t mean that the humans had to happen. From it you cannot draw a conclusion that an AI is inevitable next. It’s just a possibility that may or may not come at any given moment. Not certainty. No to either when or even if it will come. Just like with everything on this diagram – you cannot know it will happen if you don’t already have it. And then you can put

All this doesn’t even touch the random selection of facts that make all history a straight line. It’s missing all the other branches and uses only those facts that support the theory (where are the tapeworms or axolotl?) and then distorting them. But that is in the article I linked so no need to repeat it.

I love to read books and articles about Singularity. Still things like this diagram can be only presented as a joke or fiction. If you want to make transhumanism a science keep it scientific. Otherwise you’re turning into religion. And world really doesn't need another scientology.
ellestra: (Default)
The LHC (Large Hadron Collider) is to be finished by summer. When it's up an running it will produce (aside from black holes;P) a lot of data. So much data in fact that they won't be able to deal with it - won't even have enough energy for the needed amount of computers. So they need an ability to send large amounts of data to many research facilities around the world. That's how they created the Grid - next step of internet. It will use *@home-based distributed network to run its calculation. Just much faster. 1 GB per second.

When I've read about it I got wide eyed - this is the kind of future we were promised. With such a download speed you won't need hard drive - everything can be stored elsewhere and accessed realtime. Keep everything on gmail.
You could watch movies without downloading - real iTV. There's so much memory wasted because everyone needs their copy of everything they use. With that speed you'd need just one (+ some backups of course and mirrors for really popular ones). Whole network could be treated as one big computer with users not even aware if something was stored remotely or locally. We really need to switch to Linux.

Of course they can do all that because they create new, dedicated fiber-optic cables and newest, fastest technology everywhere. I could never use its capacity even if connected because some along the way is too old, too slow and with too little channel capacity. Still it's good to know it exist. In time it may even get here.  Computer technologies trickle down pretty fast. What was once new and incredible becomes normal, unnoticeable part of everyday world. I've seen a movie from early 80s today. There was paternity problem. I automatically advised them to do paternity test. Then I understood they couldn't. The methods and theory were known but not available for this. Then I understood they also didn't have internet. Probably not even computer. Not that long ago. I was already alive back then. I could barely imagine their lifestyle. So last century.

So if we manage to connect all computers with this will this network become ai? Another LHC singularity, maybe more probable then black holes.

May 2016

S M T W T F S
1234567
8 9 1011 121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 25th, 2025 12:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios